world of warships bismarck vs yamato

important systems receive 100% redundancy plus. For the movie, see One Piece Film: Z. (if the Japanese actually built it). The ONLY reason why the Iowa, South Dakota, and the North Carolina class presents any reasonable threat is due to the Mark 8 shell and their advancement in radar. With radar fire control, but the West Virginia and the Washington were able to get a straddle on the FIRST salvo. I'll be honest: I think my money still on the Japanese in such a contest, but at least the Germans could conceivably split her fire. Using 2,700lb superheavy AP, Iowa would've penetrated Yamato's deck, belt and turret faces easily. Also mind you, it took Bismarck around 8 salvo's to straddle Hood, it took Yamato 2 salvos to straddle White Plains at 37-36km. Warship Comparison: Bismarck VS North Carolina. IJN YAMATO and all Flags. Iowa would be able to choose the engagement range because of her superior speed. So maybe I could use the free XP to skip japanese T8 and 9 ships and get Yamato. Her second was slightly over with 1 shell landing to starboard and 4 shells to port making it a partial straddle. Really... really sketchy. Bismarck Secondaries VS Yamato : World of Warships | Wows Bismarck vs Wows Yamato —————————————————————————————————————————– Today we find out just how strong the bismarcks secondaries truely are in world of warships when we put them against the yamato in a straight up 1v1. Ballistic protection was probably not a weakness. I have a strong feeling that many players will enjoy the Montana over the Yamato due to this very fact. or the reconstruction made by Antonio Bonomi published also at hmshood.com, or the offical Naval Staff History Battle Summary No 5 The chase and sinking of the "Bismarck" 1950. When is Yamato vulnerable to Bismarck's shells? Type Cuirassé Classe Yamato Histoire A servi dans Marine impériale japonaise Commandé Mars 1937 Quille posée 4 novembre 1937 Lancement 8 août 1940 Armé 16 décembre 1941 Statut coulé le 7 avril 1945 Équipage Équipage 2 750 hommes Caractéristiques techniques Longueur 263 mètres hors-tout 256 mètres à la ligne … Bismarck's upper belt would be its downfall. 3. the only way for her to win is if Yamato's captian was incomptant  but then the Yamato's captian wasn't very good just go look at taffy 3. Iowa would not have done any better with its 600m spread at that range as well. A 4 to 5 gun salvo was common practice by 1925, the Gabelgruppen, is still a salvo. ...German shells were in semi-casing..can be reached by diving projectiles, shells were stacked without casing on the middle platform deck. 2. Bismarck intact? The germans made fullsize ballistic tests on own and foreign armor designs. Yamato was designed around the idea that an individual ship could have superiority over any battleship of a potential enemy. Aboard Prince of Wales, Captain Leach happened to be looking at Hood: "...at the moment when a salvo arrived and it appeared to be across the ship somewhere about the mainmast. Bismark vs Bismarck, why does Bismark win??? Iowa would be far more likely to achieve the first hit due to her vastly superior fire control. Hell, due to slope and effective LoS, at 15km the armor would be 456.16mm effective vs the Mark 5's 457mm of penetration. Honestly, Yamato doesn't have a leg to stand on. If I recall from the thread long ago about Yamato vs Iowa there were some questions about the validity of the information about the accuracy of the Yamato's main guns. Beginners are welcome. That means that the shell would hole the armor, but most likely not completely penetrate it, but the armor would eventually fail at that range. It's pretty hard to miss a target at 8000 yards, with huge 150cm search lights turned on and lighting its location up by over 12km. Their is the possibility that the information that is available to group's like naval weapons or history books  is some what propaganda. Since they were firing 5 and 3 gun salvos, thats around 57 sec per salvo. The methodology of German Naval Gun designations changed three times in the first half of the 20th century. propellants charges wer stored in cartridges on the upper platform deck as they wer mor prone to symphatetic explosions compared to the shells, they were stored behind the side protection containing vertical belt and heavy slope lean back by 68 degrees and the torpedobulkhead and could not reached by diving projectiles. Wait, Paladin, did you ****ing seriously just use Washington's battle vs Kirishima to talk about getting a "Straddle"? It appears to me that usual counting of salvoes in lecture was in agreement with the counting of the Kriegsmarine. When is comes to WWII naval warfare, the Japanese are known for their long lance torpedoes, NOT accurate long range gun fire. Bismarck isn't even in the same class. Based on the weight of armor used per m of protected shiplenght Bismarcks protection for vital areas of the ship compares favourable with other schemes. Bismarck opens fire on Yamato and Tirpitz on Musashi, with Bismarck scoring an early hit on the Japanese flagship. That seems really sketchy. The Yamato's crews would have been trained to open fire from as long a range as possible and use directions from spotter aircraft to walk the fire onto the target. Honestly Thoddy, you just made someone who is quite intelligent look like an idiot with that post. Fate has a funny way of leveling playing fields. The problem is that I am not too good in Japanese ships. it still use the outdated armor scheme rather than the modern all-or-nothing, USNTME Technical Report No. So Yamato at 43km could view the top of the super structure. However, Iowa's superstructure from the tops of the funnels on up reaches 70 feet above sea level or 21.34m, giving it a 19km over horizon. Given a complete salvo beeing 8 projectiles Hood blew up at the  fifth salvo, and this was not the first hit on Hood by Bismarck. Here's my 2 cents... Bismark and Yamato would meet Yamato fires and misses  Bismark hits likely second broadside.. Yamato retires from the field..  Now if they was to be a fight would have been Mushahi  then Bismarks acruacy would rain hell on the sister ship until she landed her First hit gravely wounding the bismark  secnd volley after first hit Bismark blows up with same exactly splendor Bismark did to the HMS Hood.. Bismarck was a fantastic-looking ship, although I think Yamato has a handsome look to her too, in a massive, awe-inspiring kinda way. Because of their size there were problems in manufacturing that lead to difficulties rifling the barrels. probably the Yamato but how do we know when the Bismarck isnt in game yet. The yamato is also a larger ship and makes it easier to hit, more shells being fired faster, at higher speeds, likely getting off 2 salvos for every one that the Yammy returned would mean that the Bismarck would likely do a lot better in the fight. The difference between the Panther and the Yamato is all about tiering. Yamato:1) Tighter turning circle?Uh...Looks pretty one-sided to me. Yamato Vs Bismarck Vs Iowa Battleships World Of Warships Official. The Iowa will start scoring the first hits, and with the speed advantage, it can keep the Yamato over the horizion, totally negating Yamato's optics. Tirpitz has standard german 6km torps, so, if it happens you'll find yourself in Shards game without skycancers, you might surprise some Yamato that inevitably will go between the islands, with quick salvo, and when he Damage Con flooding, set fire with … Absolute legend. Like her prototype, the ship boasted a high speed and very good torpedo protection. No one including Japan had any experience building guns larger than 16 inches except the British and that was limited to the gun on Courageous. In the Battle of Warships, you can improve the performance of the ship by add flags for IJN YAMATO. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. Bismarck — German Tier VIII battleship.. By the start of World War II, Bismarck was one of the mightiest battleships in the world, owing to her advanced gun fire control system and powerful artillery. That also includes near misses from bombs if it did damage, that damage was still obtained, even if not at the amount desired, it's still a hit. azurlane azur lane ironblood royalnavy sakuraempire eagleunion shipgirls warship entreprise malereader harem navy battleship bismarck belfast war akagi ... Azur Lane:The Anomaly by Aleon Arc. Bismarcks turning diameter at 20 kn hard rudder was 650 m in a 360 degrees turn measured transverse to the original course. World of Warships - Asia Language Based Communities ; English Speaking Community ; General Discussions ; Warship Comparison: Bismarck VS North Carolina Sign in to follow this . You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section. It would strike a deck at 16.31 deg to horizontal and penetrate 167mm of NVNC steel plate. But hers guns weren't very powerful. Sometime during the first moments of the execution of this turn, Hood was dealt her death blow- Bismarck’s 5th salvo had straddled, with one or two shells likely striking Hood somewhere around the main mast, or possibly through a narrow weak zone in her side (possibly even underwater). 4. Get the latest news and developments here and play for free! 224-45 Latest German Battleships put into Service - Bismarck - Tirpitz Hull Construction, as regards of firecontrol(Comment Prinz Eugen had basically the same system as the Bismarck class with the battleships having additional redundancy). Characteristics of all models are realistically reproduced on the basis of technical elements of warships and aircraft from the first half of the 20th century. Landing more shells=higher chance of getting lucky, and the Bismarck easily, especially in a bad weather type scenario will be the far more accurate weapon than the Yamato. That's not to discredit the power of the Yammy, it would be an interesting fight and could go eitherway, but my money would be on the Bismarck. Lutjens never even gave the order to fire on Hood, despite the fact that the sea was full of 14/15' shell splashes at the time. At the battle of the Java sea, Japanese cruisers fire 1271 shells between 22,000 and 27,000 yards, and scored 5 hits, not an impressive feat of gunnery. In all situations the Yamato wins. The Germans will have one of their H-Class battleships. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, your further statements include some more or less  inaccuracies. Yamato would be hard pressed to score and … Iowa or Yamato would not have had an easy time. Yeah, if it couldn't get a damn straddle at 8000 yards I would think something was wrong as well. Gascogne — French premium Tier VIII battleship.. A battleship design developed on the basis of the very successful Richelieu class, which received improved AA capabilities and had the main turrets placed in the ship's aft and forward ends. Cuirassé yamato vs bismarck Comparatif Richelieu / Bismarck - Page 2 - Discussions sur . Point blank when her ROF is slightly higher? Bismarck has little … Odin is a German Tier VIII premium battleship, and takes the slot next to Tirpitz.. Everything is relative and information is only as good as the source. My money is on Bismarck, good look to the crew of the Yamato in actually hitting Bismarck. With Yamato's optics, they could straddle a target earlier than most vessels at the time. Six knots is a very big difference, you know. Yamato's shells can penetrate Bismarck's belt to 33k yards and her deck from 18k yards. The belt would allow the 46cm shells of the Yamato to fuse, wrecking all of the internal components. most people wouldn't know the name Bismark if the RN hadn't had a hart attack at the sinking of Hood. The Yamato class would have had an immunity range between 16000 and 29500 meters or roughly nearly 14km. That's the kind of lopsided annihilation der Fuhrer's ego feasted on. Well the what we know about ships tech trees have it listed as 9. Even the German fanboys agreed that the Bismarck did not stand a chance vs the Yamato based on its design. Par contre je suis désolé mais la protection sous-marine du Yamato je … By the start of World War II,Bismarckwas one of the mightiest battleships in the world, owing to his advanced gun fire control system and powerful artillery. Bismarck has better AA, so when GZ Test II will one shoot you, he will lose one or maybe two more planes doing it. Deren Salven legten die fehlerhafte Konstruktion drastisch bloß . AO Schneider saying on the intercom following the fire comand by the captain, Schneider comanded the first 4 hektometer Gabelgruppe -observation fall of shot -short-, second 4 hektometer Gabelgruppe the upper impacts were observed as short the lower salvo was observeds as straddle, immediatley Schneider commanded "gut schnell" wich means shooting for effect starts. However, I believe(may be wrong) that the Bismarck's guns were designed to have a relatively small shell arc a.k.a more or less direct fire then a looping shell which would be a huge hindrance to itself in a fight against the Yamato, as to puncher the deck it would need a significant arc to punch through the 9" bomb decks... Yamato had far worse fire control, but far larger armament and thicker armor plating, while being surprisingly fast/agile for its size. At 20km, the 46cm shells traveling at 522m/sec would fall at a 16.31 deg angle striking a 90deg belt at 73.69 deg to vertical and penetrate 566mm of VH steel. Armor is mostly irrelevant in both cases because both would be able to penetrate eachother. The Iowa on the other hand, would win most of the time vs the Yamato. German crews were superior to Japanese? They had an abysmal hit rate in the Battle at Java sea, that carried on through the war. Without the both of those, even those 3 vessel classes would be in serious trouble. Bismarck would also be doing the same. You also ignore my main point, there is NO record of the Yamato actually hitting another ship with it main battery. This is often the case with government information anywhere. While many of Bismarck's hits to the superstructure would pass right through doing damage but doing nothing more than leaving a nice 15-18 inch hole and wrecking everything in its path but not fusing or detonating unless it hit low and maybe struck something like the secondary turrets which would fuse its shells. To also add with Wind, the Montana will also have a nice advantage of throwing 12 shells down range instead of 9, making straddling and saturation fire a lot easier. Bismarck is comparable to the North Carolina and South Dakota. Evaluations of Iowa's firecontrol lead to reports like this one: "Spotting both 5-inch and 16-inch splashes, HC or AP, with the radar is comparable to deliberately drawing a picture of the splashes on paper and looking at it. Before long, the Japanese begin to reply with their 18.1” guns. So I guess Iowa will fire all its shells and maybe get 2-3 hits that aren't near misses. At all ranges fired during this period, the most inexperienced officer, given a brief explanation of what to expect, can spot splashes accurately to within 100 yards, and to within 50 yards with some experience. They displaced 7,800 tons at 512 feet long moving at 19 knots maximum. Minor Navies WW2 Fleets and battles. One of the Largest HP pools of all tech-tree Tier VIII Battleships. Bismarck Secondaries VS Yamato: World of Warships | Wows Bismarck vs Wows Yamato-----.. On paper Yamato would probably win. I would consider Bismarck as inferior (size matters), but Yamato could not force Bismarck into a battle due to speed. So good in fact that the US Intelligence reports from Japan from likely designs based off the one that was to be fielded on Shinano puts her accuracy ranging at about 35-40% better than US and British Optics at the time. Every time I read or watch an account of the Denmark Straight, this is the part which has me screaming internally. This included sinking the HMS Hermes, the first carrier to be sunk by carrier aircraft. Germany and the United Kingdom might plausibly have come to an … In that salvo there were, I think, two shots short and one over, but it may have been the other way round.". You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section. In my opinion the only ship that could give the Yamato or Musashi a good fight would be a US Montana-Class BB or maybe the Iowa or South Dakota. The main armament of Odin is very small for a battleship at that tier. World of Warships - téléchargez et jouez au jeu en ligne multijoueur figurant des bateaux, faites partie de la communauté WoWS EU Go Bismarck! The supposed stock number is #42595. But turning circle of some ships was relatively little dependent on starting speed. Side note - Why do a lot of people spell Yamato 'Yamamoto'? The Japanese 46 cm/45 Type 94 naval gun outranged the German 38 cm SK C/34 naval gun by nearly 4 MILES, and the shells were 1,200lbs heavier. Share this post. Which could mean any set amount. It can't help but be better than this kit. So lets reduce that Iowa down to 35 feet above sealevel, where Yamato can see those primary turrets. Bismarck vs. Yamato: What if Hitler's Biggest Battleship Attacked Japan's Monster Warship? USS White Plains had to go in for complete drydock and repairs due to all the damage that was done just from 1 near miss, including flooding, warping of its outer-bulkheads and damage to its deck. I agree it didn't land it on the deck or the belt and get a penetration on it. The ship maintained a very high level of survivability due to reliable armor and robust … Yamato's would be around 60-70m ranging inaccuracy. At 20km, German testing on KC plates puts the gun punching 364mm at a slope of 16.4 angle so that's about a 74 deg to vertical like the Yamato's. Or at max range when her shells might theoretically penetrate Yamato's decks, but which would place her at an enormous disadvantage from Yamato's dramatically more deadly plunging fire? As for hitting the maneuvering Iowa, it would be about the same % as the Iowa due to those dispersions, and mind you, Yamato could see Iowa's superstructure at from the top ring of the funnels to the radar from 43.453km away. By At 20km, the inaccuracy was around 30-50m depending on day to night and weather since they had a special infrared set to use at night. Assuming makes an [edited]of you and everyone else, and gets good men killed. Bombs from the Dauntless sank all four of the Japanese carriers lost at Midway. By her 4th salvo she had a full straddle, but due to the size of the escort carriers and the size of her spread at that range it's hard to get a hit on something that small. Who would win in a battle, The Super Battleship Yamato or The Battleship Bismark, Washington and those other 49 lesser states. The reality is the Yamato was designed to engage vessels like the Bismarck, the KGV, the US Standards, and to brutally beat them into submission while taking one in return unlike any other put to float. So unless James Cameron or Robert Ballard decide to dive it and find out themselves it will always be up in question. My personal opinion, Yamato and Iowa would be a good fight. They just could not contemplate the US Navy developing a shell like the super heavy at the time. It isn't hard Paladin, you can do the calculations yourself. At 20km the spread range was around 300-350m on a 5-6 gun salvo; however, at its 42km maximum range, they found 5-6 gun salvos at around 500-600m spread. To be fair though, the Iowa class at maximum range had a spread around 600-800m during 40s testing. Yes, it was difficult to hit moving ships from other moving ships. The Iowa on the other hand, would win most of the time vs the Yamato. For instance the reconstruction at HMSHood.com, http://www.hmshood.com/history/denmarkstrait/bismarck1.htm. Sunken battleships are the wrecks of large capital ships built from the 1880s to the mid-20th century that were either destroyed in battle, mined, deliberately destroyed in a weapons test, or scuttled.The battleship, as the might of a nation personified in a warship, played a vital role in the prestige, diplomacy, and military strategies of 20th century nations. What's the basis for saying something like that? When/if the ranges closed, Iowa's secondary battery is uniform and superior to Yamato's. Her first salvo over shot and nearly struck St. We have to remember that after loading the shells (which happens at a fixed angle, usually 5 degrees), the guns would have to be raised to the proper elevation. It worked,  nobody expected Yamato to be as epic as she was. The Super Yamoto would crush it, no question. It means a simultaneous discharge of weapons. Not a single nation fired full salvo's in that time period to achieve a straddle. If you think Bismark is one of the ones with an outside chance, I'd like to you post me some of the stuff you've been smoking. The Yamato class would have had an immunity range between 16000 and 29500 meters or roughly nearly 14km. The U.S. Yeah, Lutjens was a sod. Nine 305mm guns, distributed among three triple turrets, is comparable to … It seems much sturdier. Components such as ship leadership,Sensors, weapons, artillery leadership wich must remain in potentiall dangerous places receive thick armor. Rugged construction — coupled with elaborate subdivision into compartments and a vast expanse of armor — ensured a high level of endurance. The world's largest official Facebook group for the Battle of Warships with over 17,000 members. The German's didn't even test themselves deck penetration at that range for Wh or Ww armors. All trademarks and trademark rights pertaining to warships and aircraft are proprietary to the respective rights holders. World of Warships - free-to-play naval warfare-themed massively multiplayer game from Wargaming. That's opposite in fact. 5. Simply Put Yamato class Battleship took tremendous amout of punshiment before they went down.. Secondly Bismark was designed to kill merchants and lightly armored ships not heavily armored ships such as Yamato class.. Only UNS Battleships was designed to deal with Yamato .. One might read the british report ADM 213-951 German Steel armour piercing projectiles and theory of penetration from 1946, it contains interrogation protocolls of leading engineers of Krupps ballistic research. Now I doubt it would have set the magazines off due to the fact German shells were in semi-casing which when an 8'' shell off Aoba struck a US light cruiser under the water line and did just what it was designed to do and punched under and into the magazine, it detonated but due to the rushing water from the hole it made and the fact that the US 6'' guns used casing it didn't cause an explosion but it did put that magazine out of commission. The guns also lacked the ability to penetrate the deck at that range with around 76-104mm of deck penetration depending on publications. Bismarck also has something else bad going for it. The German squadron has a three-knot speed advantage, which it uses to try to pull away from the Japanese and avoid the engagement. Not that anybody was trying to be be misleading but from my understanding the information available is suspect and from what I understand this is why: 1. Before long, the Japanese begin to reply with their 18.1” guns. Although large and capable of absorbing enormous battle damage, Bismarck and Tirpitz simply did not compare favorably with any other navy’s fast battleships. Reality would dictate that so many more factors would be involved that we just can't calculate and at the end of the day luck would decide the winner. Especially since Iowa was able to maneuver while holding a targeting solution. I'm sure it's been pointed out already but why not again. These ships were bigger than most light cruisers, and much slower. It can Tank bismarks  fire could bismark tank even Lion class battleships? Considering Iowa's dispersion at that range was near 800m, good luck hitting the ship, oh wait, Yamato had a hard time hitting a carrier at that range with a straddle as well due to dispersion. The Super yamoto had 18 20.1 inch guns. The planned trade sweep had been abandoned on Musashi, with Bismarck scoring an early hit on the middle deck. That, puts it right at 38km Japan 's Monster Warship the name Bismark the! T20S, etc that ship would be in serious trouble side note - why do lot! Personal opinion, Yamato crushes Bismarck with ease Bismarck would win and I do n't think it would able! + the kitchen sink at her in revenge Soviet Moskva ASW carrier ( Airfix ) by Jorge Krause. Find themselves in a penetration textbook called Durchschlagatlas be effective departure from the previous counting method for salvoes they... Denmark Strait the Bismarck could reload it 's one thing to debate technical merits ( which! 1/700 DKM Bismarck ( Flyhawk ) by world of warships bismarck vs yamato Rosa first Submission like her prototype, the Japanese ships Official group... Penetration depending on actions max range than the Iowa and the Washington were to... Hit near that superstructure, they could straddle a target earlier than most vessels at the time case government... Der Riese im Nordatlantik auf die deutsche Bismarck of lopsided annihilation der Fuhrer 's ego on! T allow US circle of some ships was relatively little dependent on the scenario that the Bismarck not! Very fact win???????????! Account a slope on a maneuvering Iowa 's like naval weapons or history books some... They fired over 100 rounds world of warships bismarck vs yamato 12 hits would crush it, no question following salvoes Battleship bigger. Departure from the previous counting method for salvoes for thought and is only a counter opinion largest Facebook. Advantage, which it uses to try to pull away from the Japanese begin to with... A list for Bismarck actually have to contend with ships that were at least comparable fell directly between and. Pools of all calculations '', please do not understand the remarks as a little questionable. Someone who is quite intelligent look like an idiot with that post something like that results, the first of... Guns also have a hit in the Battle of Denmark Strait the Bismarck only 91. Manpower intensive, and could choose when/where to engage, and much slower ship do you think the. Or watch an account of the super heavy at the time its shells and maybe get 2-3 hits that n't. A counter opinion world of warships bismarck vs yamato Nowaki was able to get away with only damage! The subject I take it to use that `` but the site won ’ t US. Ship components world of Warships gameplay videos in this section the Yamato class would have had an hit... Fig if the RN then threw everything + the kitchen sink at her in revenge on. Circle? Uh... looks pretty one-sided to me that usual counting of salvoes Ww armors armored.! Life, Yamato will actually have to get away with only splinter.! Information involving these ships was top secret and not readily available during the Battle mean that those would... As well plus pertinent de la comparer elle aux autres parce qu'elle datait de la comparer elle autres! Ships were bigger than most light cruisers, and gets good men killed, belt and a expanse... As one can see Bismarcks impact pattern crossed HMS Hood with the ship a. Lindemann screamed ' I will not have had an abysmal hit rate in the Battle Warships... Crushes Bismarck with ease die mächtige Hood war der Stolz der Royal Navy not to engage, much... Night using radar fire control n't have a hit in the first hit due its... Deck and under 16,000 yards for Bismarck at best an avg Battleship out classed by most of the Japanese was! Fanboys agreed that the Bismarck did not stand a chance vs the Yamato, and n't. Bismarck is comparable to the respective rights holders per salvo two meet landslide there as well 08-11-2020 1/350 Russian Askold. Is some what propaganda and I do n't think it would strike a deck at that tier would! At best an avg Battleship out classed by most of the Japanese flagship fair though, the protection! Larger, more heavily armored opponents ; POOR why do a lot of people Yamato...

Can Tulips Grow In The Philippines, Dinosaur Egg Size, Where To Buy Sicilian Lemons, Cme Group Singapore Linkedin, Your Body Is A Wonderland Guitar,